PESQ, Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality, is a family of standards comprising a test methodology for automated assessment of the speech quality as experienced by a user of a telephony system. It is standardized as ITU-T recommendation P.862 (02/01). Today, PESQ is a worldwide applied industry standard for objective voice quality testing used by phone manufacturers, network equipment vendors and telecom operators. Its usage requires a license.
Video PESQ
Measurement scope
PESQ was particularly developed to model subjective tests commonly used in telecommunications (e.g. ITU-T P.800) to assess the voice quality by human beings. Consequently, PESQ employs true voice samples as test signals. In order to characterize the listening quality as perceived by users, it is of paramount importance to load modern telecom equipment with speech-like signals. Many systems are optimized for speech and would respond in an unpredictable way to non-speech signals (e.g. tones, noise). Guidelines for proper applications of voice test samples are defined in the PESQ application guide ITU-T P.862.3.
Maps PESQ
ITU-T's family of full reference objective voice quality measurements started in 1997 with P.861 (PSQM), which was superseded by P.862 (PESQ) in 2001. P.862 was later complemented with the recommendations P.862.1 (mapping of PESQ scores to a MOS scale), P.862.2 (wideband measurements) and P.862.3 (application guide). Since 2011 P.863 (POLQA) is in force. Two additional implementer's guides for P.863 have been consented by ITU-T Study Group 12 in November 2011. In addition to the above listed full reference methods, the list of ITU-T's objective voice quality measurement standards also includes P.563 (no-reference algorithm).
Testing typology
Depending on the information that is made available to an algorithm, voice-quality test algorithms can be divided into two main categories:
- A "full reference" (FR) algorithm has access to and makes use of the original reference signal for a comparison (i.e. a difference analysis). It can compare each sample of the reference signal (talker side) to each corresponding sample of the degraded signal (listener side). FR measurements deliver the highest accuracy and repeatability but can only be applied for dedicated tests in live networks (e.g. drive test tools for mobile network benchmarks).
- A "no reference" (NR) algorithm only uses the degraded signal for the quality estimation and has no information of the original reference signal. NR algorithms (like e.g. P.563) are low-accuracy estimates only, as the originating voice characteristics (e.g. male or female talker, background noise, non-voice) of the source reference is completely unknown. A common variant of NR algorithms doesn't even analyze the decoded audio signal but works on an analysis of the digital bit stream on an IP packet level. The measurement is consequently limited to a transport-stream analysis.
PESQ is a full-reference algorithm and analyzes the speech signal sample-by-sample after a temporal alignment of corresponding excerpts of reference and test signal. PESQ can be applied to provide an end-to-end (E2E) quality assessment for a network, or characterize individual network components.
PESQ results principally model mean opinion scores (MOS) that cover a scale from 1 (bad) to 5 (excellent). A mapping function to MOS-LQO is outlined under P.862.1.
See also
- Perceptual Objective Listening Quality Assessment (POLQA)
- Perceptual Evaluation of Video Quality (PEVQ)
- Perceptual Evaluation of Audio Quality (PEAQ)
- Hearing-Aid Speech Quality Index (HASQI)
References
External links
- Official Website
- Official Website on POLQA
- Technical Information on PESQ
- Application Note 1GA49: Psychoacoustic Audio Quality Measurements Using R&S UPV Audio Analyzer
- Application Note 1MA119: PESQ Measurement for GSM with R&SCMUgo
- Application Note 1MA136: PESQ Measurement for CDMA2000 with R&SCMUgo
- Application Note 1MA137: PESQ Measurement for WCDMA with R&SCMUgo
- Application Note 1MA149: VoIP Measurements for WiMAX
Source of the article : Wikipedia
0 Comments